(no subject)
May. 13th, 2009 11:06 amDear Cheneys,
Perhaps I am mistaken, but I am under the impression that doing what's right in the face of danger is called bravery. Conversely, setting aside ones morality in the hope of safety is called cowardice.
You worry that the release of information will cause those who torture in the name of the United States to fear the consequences of their actions. Well, I worry about torturers not fearing the consequences of their actions. I don't know that torture is ever necessary, but I don't know that it isn't. However, killing a human is sometimes necessary, but we do not make it legal. We do not work to make sure people lose their fear of the consequences of killing. So why should we do so with torture? I want torture to be something we're never comfortable with, no matter who it is practiced on.
You say what we do is not torture. There is a simple test to know the truth of that: Would we call it torture if it was done to one of our citizens? We would and have done so.
People do a lot of crazy things when they're afraid. A quality I look for in a leader is the ability to act rationally in the face of fear. You believe the current administration is afraid to do what's necessary, I believe you're afraid to do what's right. I think this stems from a simple difference of view. You believe the greatest danger we face comes from outside, I believe it comes from within. I would rather die at the hands of cowards and bullies than live in a nation of cowards and bullies.
Sincerely,
Angstzeit
Perhaps I am mistaken, but I am under the impression that doing what's right in the face of danger is called bravery. Conversely, setting aside ones morality in the hope of safety is called cowardice.
You worry that the release of information will cause those who torture in the name of the United States to fear the consequences of their actions. Well, I worry about torturers not fearing the consequences of their actions. I don't know that torture is ever necessary, but I don't know that it isn't. However, killing a human is sometimes necessary, but we do not make it legal. We do not work to make sure people lose their fear of the consequences of killing. So why should we do so with torture? I want torture to be something we're never comfortable with, no matter who it is practiced on.
You say what we do is not torture. There is a simple test to know the truth of that: Would we call it torture if it was done to one of our citizens? We would and have done so.
People do a lot of crazy things when they're afraid. A quality I look for in a leader is the ability to act rationally in the face of fear. You believe the current administration is afraid to do what's necessary, I believe you're afraid to do what's right. I think this stems from a simple difference of view. You believe the greatest danger we face comes from outside, I believe it comes from within. I would rather die at the hands of cowards and bullies than live in a nation of cowards and bullies.
Sincerely,
Angstzeit